Prison sentences for producers approved
In her article in the Daily Mail, British journalist Jenni Murray argues for a ban on sexually explicit content. Murray argues that such a measure would protect society from unimaginably horrific videos and depictions of physical aggression, coercion, exploitation, and crying women.
In her post, she also highlights her anti-sex work agenda, arguing that no sex worker does this job by choice and that they all feel used, abused, and harmed because of their experiences. A complete ban on pornography, Murray said, would not only prevent women from being raped in the porn business, but also reduce the belief among some in society that sexual violence against women is acceptable.
A renewed attempt to ban porn
Although she acknowledges that previous attempts to ban pornography have not been successful, Murray suggests that sexual assault is at issue when it comes to implementing such a ban.
In her argument, Murray supports the arguments of critics of pornography who argue that there is a link between pornography consumption and a culture of sexual abuse and violence against women. However, this line of reasoning is controversial and there is no scientific evidence to support a direct link between pornography consumption and sexual violence.
Some researchers argue that pornography can help reinforce existing sexist and violent attitudes, especially among people already exposed to such attitudes. However, it is difficult to prove a direct link between pornography use and sexual violence.
Read also:
– Porn-free city in the Australian outback?
– New York wants to legalize prostitution
– Apple wants to scan iPhones & Co. for illegal content
– Is streaming porn movies actually legal?
– PETA demands sex ban for meat-eating men
A ban on pornography would also pose a threat to freedom of expression and freedom of information, which are guaranteed by international human rights conventions. There are also concerns that a ban could lead to an increase in black markets and illegal activities.
A ban could lead to discrimination
An important factor not considered in Murray’s argument is the fact that many people work in the adult industry by choice and that it provides them with a decent income. A ban could also lead to further stigmatization and discrimination against these people.
Instead, it would be more important to improve working conditions in the erotic business and ensure that all parties involved are adequately protected. It should also be ensured that there are no forms of sexual exploitation and violence in the production and distribution of pornography.
Overall, Murray’s call for a ban on pornography is problematic and controversial because it took a one-dimensional approach to a complex issue and ignored important factors such as freedom of expression, freedom of information, and the rights of workers in the porn industry.
Die Buch-Empfehlung unseres Chefredakteurs Mario Meyer:
"Künstliche Intelligenz – Werden wir alle vernichtet?"