Court decision does not say rent reduction
An unusual court decision from Frankfurt is causing a stir: The Higher Regional Court (OLG) ruled that a landlord sunbathing naked in the yard is not grounds for a rent reduction. The tenants, an executive search firm in the upscale Westend neighborhood, had complained about it. But the court found that this does not affect the fitness for use of the rented property. In this blog article, we will take a closer look at the court’s decision and the reasons behind it.
Background to the “naked landlord
The house in question is located in a very upscale residential area in Frankfurt’s West End, which offers peace and dignity. It is a residential building, which also houses an office floor. The tenant, the personnel consultancy, had reduced and partially suspended the rent after almost a year because she felt disturbed by the naked landlord. However, the landlord did not accept this and sued for payment of the outstanding rent.
The case initially ended up before the district court, which largely upheld the landlord’s claim. The tenant appealed, but had little success. The OLG ruled that a rent reduction was only justified due to extensive construction work in the neighborhood, which resulted in noise and dust. In this case, 15 percent rent reduction was considered appropriate.
Court decision and reasoning
The OLG based its decision on the fact that the usability of the rental object was not impaired by the naked landlord in the yard. Aesthetic sensibility plays no role in this and a “grossly improper act” is not present. In addition, the sun lounger is only visible if you lean far out of the window.
Furthermore, the court found that the “junk” allegedly placed in the hallway did not go beyond what could be accepted as socially acceptable. Food odors are also no reason for a rent reduction, because in a mixed-use house, it is part of the process to occasionally cook lunch. At the on-site visit, which was specially scheduled for lunchtime, the court was unable to detect any kitchen odors.
The “musty smell” claimed by the tenant was also not perceptible to the judges. They also did not encounter a naked man in the hallway, as the defendant had claimed. The landlord credibly explained that he always wears a bathrobe, which he takes off only immediately before the sunbed.
Conclusion
The decision of the Frankfurt Higher Regional Court shows that the courts have the fitness for use of a rental object in mind and not the aesthetic sensibilities of the tenants. In this case, it was ruled that a naked landlord in the yard is not grounds for a rent reduction because the serviceability of the rental property is not impaired. In addition, it was emphasized that there was no “grossly improper action” and that the sun lounger was only visible when leaning far out of the window.
Read also:
– Adult videos free download – here’s how!
– Has the Gina-Lisa Lohfink case reformed criminal sexual law?
– Sex story: Marie, Marc, Sara and Sophie in slave villa
– Dutch court sets milestone for amateur models’ rights
This case underscores that tenants should carefully consider whether a rent reduction based on impairment is warranted. The courts attach great importance to the fact that the serviceability of a rental object is actually impaired before they allow a rent reduction. Aesthetic sensitivities or personal preferences of the tenants do not play a role.
Amicable agreement preferred
Tenants and landlords should always try to reach an amicable agreement before taking legal action. In this case, open communication between the parties might have led the landlord to be considerate of the tenant’s concerns without the need for litigation.
Ultimately, this decision shows that German tenancy law aims to strike an appropriate balance between the interests of tenants and landlords. While tenants have the right to demand a rent reduction if the serviceability of their rental property is impaired, they must also accept that personal preferences and aesthetic sensibilities are not sufficient to justify a rent reduction.
Overall, tenants and landlords should always strive to maintain good communication and fair interaction to avoid misunderstandings and disputes. In many cases, open and honest communication can help both parties find satisfactory solutions and build a trusting relationship.
Source: Hessenschau
Möchtest du unseren Newsletter bekommen?
Einmal wöchentlich versenden wir unser "Bergfest" mit den neuesten Beiträgen, News, Interviews und mehr, damit du nichts mehr verpasst – kostenlos!
